Description Detail

Vol.19, No.4(2012-)(170) 
3D Fabric Used in the Shoe-Pads Comfortableness to Assess
三層網布用於鞋底墊之舒適性評估
C. H. Chiu, W. H. Hsing
邱繼弘, 邢文灝
Most of shoe-pads combine fabric with. In this experiment, we use the shoe-pads which combines 3D Fabric with EVA foaming material compare with the shoe-pads which combines knitted fabric with EVA foaming material that we have seen usually, and estimated which is more comfortable by theirs functions of shock-absorbing, preventing slide and compression. According the experiment, the shoe-pads combine HR430 with 4mm EVA foaming material is better than others, its attrition modulus(0.5) is the highest of 3D fabrics, its change rate is the second low(61%), its value of G in the shock-absorbing test is the lowest(8.7)(Low is better). Comparing with the shoe-pads which combines knitted fabric with EVA foaming material that we have seen usually--- attrition modulus(0.63), change rate(84%), value of G(14.3). Though the preventing slide of the shoe-pads which combines 3D Fabric with EVA foaming material is worse, but others functions are much better than the shoe-pads which combines knitted fabric with EVA foaming material.
鞋墊大多為織物貼合EVA發泡材的形式所組成,本實驗主要是用三層網布(HR278TN、HR430、HR249、HR023、HR029)來貼合EVA發泡材與目前市面上常見的針織布貼合EVA發泡材來分析與比較,並以止滑、吸震、壓縮來評估何者舒適性較佳。由實驗結果得HR430貼合4mmEVA發泡材為較適合製成鞋墊,其中摩擦係數0.5,知為三層網布中最高0、形變率61%為在三層網布貼合4mmEVA發泡材中第二、吸震測試中的G值達到最低的8.7相對於針織布貼合EVA發泡材的摩擦係數0.63、形變率84%、G值14.3來說,儘管在止滑性方面三層網布貼合EVA發泡材較差但在其它方面的性能卻是遠遠優於於針織布貼合EVA發泡材。
3D fabric, Insole
鞋墊、三層網布、3D織物
Year Volume
2021 28.1 | 28.2
2020 27.1 | 27.2
27.3 | 27.4
27.5 | 27.6
27.7 |
2019 26.1 |
2018 25.1 |
2017 24.1 | 24.2
24.3 | 24.4
24.5 | 24.6
24.7 | 24.8
24.9 |
2016 23.1 | 23.2
23.3 | 23.4
23.5 | 23.6
23.7 | 23.8
2015 22.1 | 22.2
22.3 | 22.4
22.5 |
2014 21.1 | 21.2
21.3 |
2013 20.1 | 20.2
20.3 | 20.4
2012 19.1 | 19.2
19.3 | 19.4
2011 18.1 | 18.2
2010 17.4